Improving the Developer Experience with Developer Productivity Engineering

A presentation at Developer Week 2024 in February 2024 in Oakland, CA, USA by Baruch Sadogursky

Slide 1

Slide 1

Slide 2

Slide 2

Slide 3

Slide 3

Slide 4

Slide 4

Baruch Sadogursky - @jbaru ch × Developer Productivity Advocate × Gradle Inc × Development -> DevOps -> #DPE

Slide 5

Slide 5

shownotes × × × × speaking.jbaru.ch Slides Video All the links!

Slide 6

Slide 6

Slide 7

Slide 7

Don’t ruin the flow

Slide 8

Slide 8

“The build takes forever, I am distracted to do other things and the context switch is terrible”

Slide 9

Slide 9

Slide 10

Slide 10

Don’t frustrate the developers

Slide 11

Slide 11

“we have a flanky test, it is irrelevant 99.5% of the time , but it always runs and it is last in the suite”

Slide 12

Slide 12

Slide 13

Slide 13

Don’t boil the frog

Slide 14

Slide 14

“I have a feeling that everything is slower somehow…”

Slide 15

Slide 15

Slide 16

Slide 16

Developer Productivity == A/M Autonomy /P == motivation Tools and people aren’t in my way Mastery Tools and processes help me to excel Purpose I want to be productive, i.e. create the product

Slide 17

Slide 17

Developer productivity Enginee ring!

Slide 18

Slide 18

Developer Productivity Enginee Foster Faster Feedback Collaborate through Effective Tooling Eliminate Toil for Developers Dedicated Organizational Mindset ring Embrace Rigorous Observability for Proactive Improvement Prioritize Automation and Eliminate Bottlenecks Outcomes Over Output

Slide 19

Slide 19

Talk is cheap, show me the goods!

Slide 20

Slide 20

Small DPE improvements make a × × × × × huge difference Generate code faster: Better IDE Test better: Testcontainers Enforce better code: Sonar Test more reliably: Flaky test detection Foster Faster Feedback:

Slide 21

Slide 21

feedback efficiency × × × × IDE: Sub-seconds (I type, it marks it red) Build: Seconds CI: Minutes Production: Hours/Days

Slide 22

Slide 22

Reverse dependency on distance from developers IDE Build CI Feedback Time Faster Slower Distance from Developers Expected Production

Slide 23

Slide 23

Reverse dependency on distance from developers IDE Build CI Production Feedback Time Faster Slower Distance from Developers Expected Real

Slide 24

Slide 24

Slide 25

Slide 25

It is slow!

Slide 26

Slide 26

Slide 27

Slide 27

It is slow and the developers h ave no idea why!

Slide 28

Slide 28

What is build? × × × × × Project setup Downloading the Internet Artifact generation: Compilation, packaging, etc Tests Artifact deployment

Slide 29

Slide 29

What can go wrong? × × × × × Project setup Downloading the Internet Artifact generation: Compilation, packaging, etc Tests Artifact deployment

Slide 30

Slide 30

When can it go wrong? At any time.

Slide 31

Slide 31

The Build frustrates the developers

Slide 32

Slide 32

Let’s ask Chatgpt

Slide 33

Slide 33

What the actual f*ck?! × Skipping tests defeats the purpose of the build! × How about skipping compilation? × We want faster feedback, not less feedback

Slide 34

Slide 34

What feedback do we want?

Slide 35

Slide 35

Ci/cd pipeline quality gates It compiles Basic Integration tests Basic Unit tests Basic Quality Linting Quality Code coverage Dependency scanning SAST/DAST Quality Sec Static code analysis Sec Sec Secrets scanning Resource Utilization Nonfunc Nonfunc Load Testing Nonfunc Compliance

Slide 36

Slide 36

Slide 37

Slide 37

Two types of feedback x e.g., CI/CD x we never wait for it x results are distracting x e.g., build x we’ll wait for it in the flow x we’ll be pissed off when it’s slow

Slide 38

Slide 38

Reverse dependency on distance from developers IDE Build CI Feedback Time Faster Slower Distance from Developers Production

Slide 39

Slide 39

Reverse dependency on distance from developers Faster IDE Build CI Feedback Time Commit time synchronous asynchronous Slower Distance from Developers Production

Slide 40

Slide 40

Ideal build time feedback It compiles Basic Integration tests Basic Unit tests Basic Quality Linting Quality Code coverage Dependency scanning SAST/DAST Quality Sec Static code analysis Sec Sec Secrets scanning Resource Utilization Nonfunc Nonfunc Load Testing Nonfunc Compliance

Slide 41

Slide 41

Slide 42

Slide 42

Delightful build (pick two): ☑ provides max feedback ☑ fast

Slide 43

Slide 43

Skip what can be skipped (but no more!)

Slide 44

Slide 44

Avoidance: Incremental build × Don’t build what didn’t changed × Don’t build what isn’t affected

Slide 45

Slide 45

Avoidance: Incremental build s hortcomings × Relies on produced artifacts × Relies on architectural decisions

Slide 46

Slide 46

Avoidance: Caching × × × × Makes the build faster Makes the build faster for everybody Makes the build faster always Makes all parts of the build faster

Slide 47

Slide 47

Slide 48

Slide 48

Avoidance: Predictive test selec tion × Learns de-facto code change effects × Skips tests with high degree of confidence

Slide 49

Slide 49

Predictive Test prediction What changed Where it changed Correlate with observed test failures Predictions which changes will fail which tests

Slide 50

Slide 50

Black magic in action × The more tests a project has, the less they break × Refactorings in Java break tests less than in JavaScript

Slide 51

Slide 51

Slide 52

Slide 52

Speed up what can’t be skipped

Slide 53

Slide 53

Test parallelization × Use max power of local machine × (Yes, your boss should buy you the bleeding edge)

Slide 54

Slide 54

Slide 55

Slide 55

Test distribution × × × × CI uses fan-out to speed-up tests Shouldn’t you enjoy it for local tests? Use the cloud to distribute test load RUN ALL THE NEEDED TESTS!

Slide 56

Slide 56

Don’t let it slide

Slide 57

Slide 57

Observe and improve × Measure local build times across time and environments × Detect downfacing trends × Find root causes and improve

Slide 58

Slide 58

Slide 59

Slide 59

The gains are real!

Slide 60

Slide 60

Slide 61

Slide 61

Slide 62

Slide 62